Plant Anatomy against crime: Araucaria angustifolia wood sawdust identification

Resumo

Teams from São Paulo Criminalistics Institute receive chainsaws allegedly involving deforestation in preservation areas. Here, we aimed to examine wood and bark sawdust from chainsaws to determine the potential of differentiating materials from Araucaria angustifolia (native), Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus spp. (exotic). Such knowledge is crucial in the elucidation of environmental crimes, particularly where occurs A. angustifolia, a species at risk of extinction. We obtained samples of adult tree trunks from A. angustifolia, Pinus spp., Eucalyptus spp., and Corymbia citriodora. Our reference samples of wood and bark came from material used in other studies by the Instituto Florestal team. In a blinded manner, we took sawdust samples of A. angustifolia, Pinus caribaea and Eucalyptus grandis and tagged with codes. We prepared all samples based on the standard methodology for wood and bark maceration. Then, we prepared histological slides and comparatively analyzed several slides under light microscopy. Results show that it is possible to obtain cell fragments useful in separating the groups of plants studied. For example, tracheids on the cell walls of A. angustifolia have polygonal pits, with two or more alternating pits, while on Pinus spp., circular pits are observed, usually with uniseriate pits on the radial walls and opposing pits in the case of more than one row. Moreover, vessel elements and fibres can only be found in the wood fragments of Eucalyptus spp. Bark cells and cells from immature tissues also serve as corroborative evidence.

Referências

  1. L.M. Burger, H.G. Richter. Anatomia da madeira. Nobel, Brasil, 154, 1991.
  2. R.F. Evert. Esau's Plant Anatomy, Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: their Structure, Function, and Development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Estados Unidos da América, 601, 2006.
  3. R.B. Miller, M.C. Wiemann. Separation of Dalbergia nigra from Dalbergia spruceana. Research Paper FPL-RP-632. US. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Estados Unidos da América, 2006.
  4. C. Mainieri, J.P. Chimelo. Fichas de características das madeiras brasileiras. IPT, Brasil, 418, 1989.
  5. E.A. Wheeler, P. Baas, P. Gasson. IAWA List of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bulletin 10, 219-332, 1989.
  6. H.G. Richter, D. Grosser, I. Heiz, P.E. Gasson. IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification. IAWA Journal 25, 1-70, 2004.
  7. UNODC. Best Practice Guide for Forensic Timber Identification. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime. Laboratory and Scientific Section, Global Programme for Combating Wildlife and Forest Crime, Áustria, 1- 226, 2016.
  8. H. Lorenzi. Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas do Brasil. Instituto Plantarum, Brasil, 370, 2000.
  9. O.J. Wilson, R.J. Walters, F.E. Mayle, D.V. Lingner, A.C. Vibrans. Cold spot microrefugia hold the key to survival for Brazil's Critically Endangered Araucaria tree. Global change biology, 25(12), 4339-4351, 2019.
  10. K. Hueck. As florestas da América do Sul: ecologia, composição e importância econômica. Polígono, Brasil, 465, 1972.
  11. M.A. Castro, N.M. Apóstolo, L.E. Navarro. Bark anatomy of three indigenous conifers from southern South America. Australian Journal of Botany 54, 73-82, 2006.
  12. A.M. Siegloch, J.N.C. Marchiori. Anatomia da madeira de treze espécies de coníferas. Brazilian Journal of Wood Science 6, 149-165, 2015.
Creative Commons License

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.

Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Brazilian Journal of Criminalistics

Compartilhe

Download

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Autor(es)

Artigos mais lidos do(s) mesmo(s) autor(es)