Use of Diagnostic Imaging Applied to Forensic Medicine


Abstract

The practice of autopsy has not changed significantly over the centuries. However, with the growth of Jewish and Muslim communities, as well as the refusal of family members, the rate of autopsy performance has declined worldwide. In this context, the implementation of non-invasive or minimally invasive techniques led diagnostic imaging to be rapidly considered an alternative. Thus, Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) emerged as possible methods to be employed. Due to the short image acquisition time, excellent anatomical identification, ability to assess bone injuries, and capacity to highlight the presence of gases and foreign bodies, CT was considered a highly effective tool. Furthermore, it may be regarded as having greater specificity and sensitivity than MRI in cases involving firearm homicides, sharp weapon injuries, and traffic accidents. However, due to its superior soft tissue detailing, MRI demonstrates greater effectiveness in cases of sexual assault and hemorrhages. Virtual autopsy may be an important tool in homicides, natural and in-hospital deaths, victims of abuse, and attempted homicide cases. Therefore, its use in criminal proceedings and investigations proves useful on many occasions, serving as a strong legal instrument. Aiming at applicability within Brazilian forensic medicine, this study sought to compile scientific articles in an integrative literature review in order to broaden the knowledge of the professionals involved, demonstrating the applicability of imaging in legal proceedings and autopsy practice.


Keywords

autópsia virtual
necropsia
tomografia computadorizada
ressonância magnética
Virtual Autopsy
Necropsy
Computed Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Autopsia Virtual
Necropsia
Tomografía Computarizada
Resonancia Magnética

References

  1. L.C.L Prestes JR; R. Ancillotti. Manual de técnicas em necropsia médico-legal. Rubio, Brasil, 1-6, 2009.
  2. M.J. Thali; C. Jackowski; L. Oesterhelweg; S.G. Ross; R. Dirnhofer. Virtopsy – The Swiss virtual autopsy approach. Leg. Med. 9, 100-104, 2007.
  3. I.S.D. Roberts; R.E. Benamore; E.W. Benbow; S.H. Lee; J.N. Harris; A. Jackson; S. Mallett; T. Pantakar; C. Peeble; C. Roobottom; Z.C Traill. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379, 136-142, 2012.
  4. D. Wichman; A. Heinemann; S. Zahler; H. Vogel; W. Hopker; K. Puschel; S. Kluge. Prospective study of device-related complications in intensive care unit detected by virtual autopsy. Br. J. Anaesth. 120, 1229-1236, 2018.
  5. A.S. Bolliger; M.J. Thali. Imaging and virtual autopsy: looking back and forward. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 1-7, 2015.
  6. L.J.P. Sonnemans; B. Kubat; M. Prokop; W.M. Klein. Can virtual autopsy with postmortem CT improve clinical diagnosis of cause of death? A retrospective observational cohort study in a Dutch tertiary referral centre. BMJ Open 8, 1-9, 2018.
  7. S.E. Westphal; J. Apitzch; T. Penzkofer; A.H. Mahnken; R. Knüchel. Virtual CT autopsy in clinical pathology: feasibility in clinical autopsies. Virchows Arch 461, 211-219, 2012.
  8. C.F. de Freitas. Imaginologia. Artes Médicas Ltda, Brasil, 11-12, 2014.
  9. S. Grabherr; C. Egger; R. Vilarino; L. Campana; M. Jotterand; F. Dedouit. Modern post-mortem imaging: an update on recent developments. Forensic Sci Res 2, 52-64, 2017.
  10. S. Ross; L. Ebner; P. Flach; R. Brodhage; S.A. Bolliger; A. Christe; M.J. Thali. Postmortem Whole-Body MRI in Traumatic Causes of Death. Am J Roentgenol 199, 1186-1192, 2012.
  11. A. Panda; A. Kumar; S. Gamanagatti; B. Mishra. Virtopsy Computed Tomography in Trauma: Normal Postmortem Changes and Pathologic Spectrum of Findings. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 44, 391-406, 2015.
  12. D. Gascho; M.J.Thali; T. Niemann. Post-mortem computed tomography: Technical principles and recommended parameter settings for high-resolution imaging. Med Sci Law 58, 70-82, 2018.
  13. A. Christe; P. Flach; S. Ross; D. Spendlove; S. Bolliger; P. Vock; M.J. Thali. Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: specific and unspecific postmortem signs. Leg Med 12, 215-22, 2010.
  14. O.J. Arthurs; J.C. Hutchison; N.J. Sebire. Current issues in postmortem imaging of perinatal and forensic childhood deaths. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 13, 58-66, 2017.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Criminalistics

Share

Author(s)