Caracterização físico-química e avaliação de sistemas de proteção contra corrosão de projéteis deflagrados por armas de fogo


Abstract


It is commonly observed in ballistics testing laboratories that the integrity of firearm projectiles to be analyzed is irreversibly damaged, which makes the bullet comparison tests difficult or even unachievable. The scientific literature on different forms of bullets protection against corrosion and storage is in general scarce and difficult to access because those procedures are not published in literature. In the present work, three different types of projectiles expelled from firearms with rifled barrels were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (EDX) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and it was analyzed the effect of coating such projectiles with anticorrosive lubricant (WD) and paraffin (PA) in increasing resistance to oxidation/corrosion and in preserving the bullets fingerprints. The corrosion analysis was carried out by comparing the rifling marks before and after the projectiles coating by submitting them to a forced oxidation testing. The results obtained so far suggest that paraffin coating remains for more time compared to the WD coating. Nevertheless, both materials require a simplified low-cost methodology for preserving projectiles expelled from firearms for more than 33 days.


References

  1. J.L. Booker. Examination of the Badly Damaged Bullet. J. Forens. Sci. Soc. 20: 153-162 (1980).
  2. S.K. Dutta; S. Saikia; A. Barman; R. Roy; K. Bora; L.B. Mahanta; R. Suresh. Study on enhanced deep learning approaches for value-added identification and segmentation of striation marks in bullets for precise firearm classification. Applied Soft Computing 112; 107789 (2021).
  3. D. Tocchetto. Balística Forense: aspectos técnicos e jurídicos. 4a ed Campinas-SP; Millennium, (2005).
  4. AFTE Committee for the Advancement of the Science of Firearm and Toolmark Identification. Theory of identification as it relates to toolmarks: revised. AFTE J. 43(4): 287 (2011).
  5. R.M. Thompson. Firearm Identification in the Forensic Science Laboratory. National District Attorneys Association. Retrieved January 19, (2016).
  6. D. Rao; H. Singh; J. Mowatt. Effects of human decomposition on test fired bullet – An experimental research. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 6(1): 7-21 (2016).
  7. C. Gaylarde; B. Little. Biodeterioration of stone and metal - Fundamental microbial cycling processes with spatial and temporal scale differences. Sci Total Environ 823:153193 (2022).
  8. T. Xiang; J. Liu; Q. Liu; F. Wei; Z. Lv; Y. Yang, L.P. Shi; C. Li; D. Chen; G. Xu. Self-healing solid slippery surface with porous structure and enhanced corrosion resistance. Chemical Engineering Journal 417, 128083 (2021).
  9. S. Yang; S. Richter; W. Robbins; S. Nesic. Evaluation of the protectiveness of a paraffin layer in CO2 corrosion of mild steel. NACE - International Corrosion Conference Series 3. 2554-2568 (2012).
  10. M.A. Collender; K.A.J. Doherty; K.T. Stanton. An investigation into the factors that influence toolmark identifications on ammunition discharged from semi-automatic pistols recovered from car fires. Sci. Justice 57 (1): 41-52 (2017).
  11. R.M. Larrison. Degradation of fired bullets and cartridge cases in different environmental mediums. Afte Journal, 38, n. 3, p. 223 (2006).
  12. S. Brown. The Effect of Weathering on Bullet and Cartridge Case Analysis and Identification. University of Central Oklahoma (2022).
  13. A. Niklasson; L. Johansson; J. Svensson. Influence of Acetic Acid Vapor on the Atmospheric Corrosion of Lead. J. of The Electrochemical Society 152 10.1149 /1.2084348 (2005).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Criminalistics

Share

Author(s)