INDIRECT AND DIRECT CRIMINAL EXPERTISE ON TWO CANINES IN ORDER TO FIND OUT THE SITUATION OF MALESTREATMENT IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF GOIÂNIA IN JANUARY 2022: CASE REPORT

Abstract

The quality of considerations and the production of material evidence, dependent on qualified professionals, protocols and technical tools grounded in forensic veterinary medicine. The crimes of animal intoxication and mistreatment are common in the routine of forensic veterinary medicine. Being the clinical evaluation and analysis of the five main freedoms in animal welfare essential for the production of criminal expertise reports. The freedoms evaluated are: nutritional, sanitary, environmental, behavioral and psychological. Here we present the conduction of criminal expertise in two canines. The main findings contrary to animal welfare are presented. Concluding at the end of the play regarding the degree of well-being.

Keywords

animal violence
Violência Doméstica
Violência animal
Abuso animal
bem-estar-estar animal
Medicina veterinária forense
Medicina veterinária legal
Medicina veterinária do coletivo

References

  1. Arkow P., Boyden P., Patterson-Kane E. Animal control, animal welfare, and the veterinarian. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2011, 191(8), 937-942;
  2. Brasil, Senado Federal. Constituição da república federativa do Brasil. 1988;
  3. Brasil, Senado Federal. Decreto-Lei nº 9.605. 1998. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L9605.htm;
  4. Brownlie H.W., Munro R. The Veterinary Forensic Necropsy: A Review of Procedures and Protocols. Vet Pathol. 2016;53(5):919–28;
  5. Pancheri I., Campos R.A.C. Comentários à Lei Sansão: Crimes de maus-tratos contra cães e gatos sob a lei nº 14.064/20. Unisul de Fato e de Direito: Revista Jurídica da Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina. 2021;11(22):61p.;
  6. Hammerschmidt J., Molento C.F.M. Identificação de maus-tratos contra animais por meio de um protocolo de perícia em bem-estar animal. Revista de Educação Continuada em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia do CRMV-SP. 2015; 13:89;
  7. Merck D., Miller D.M., Reisman R.W. CSI: Neglect in Veterinary Forensics: Animal Cruelty Investigations. 2ª ed. Merck M, editor. Blackwell Publishing; 2013, 207-30;
  8. Lockwood R., Arkow P. Animal abuse and interpersonal violence: The cruelty connection and its implications for veterinary pathology. Veterinary Pathology. 2016; 53:910–8;
  9. Hammerschmidt J., Molento C.F.M. Protocol for expert report on animal welfare in case of companion animal cruelty suspicion. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 2014; 51:282–96;
  10. Hammerschmidt, J. Diagnóstico de maus-tratos contra animais e estudo dos fatores relacionados. [Tese]. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná; 2017;
  11. Hammerschmidt J. Desenvolvimento e aplicação de perícia em bem-estar animal. Universidade Federal do Paraná. [Dissertação]. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná; 2012;
  12. Peleteiro M.C., Silva J.F.D., Pereira P.D., Carvalho T., Faustino A., Correia J. Manual de Necrópsia Veterinária. Lisboa: Lidel - Edições Técnicas, Lda; 2016;
  13. Delgado V., Prada J., Pires I. Understanding the Veterinary Forensic Necropsy. India: AkiNik Publications. 2019;
  14. Lockwood G.R. Understanding cruelty to animals. Society and Animals. 2006; 3:83–93;
  15. Rodrigues, L.F. Métodos de avaliação da condição corporal de cães. Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2011. https://files.cercomp.ufg.br/weby/up/67/o/semi2011_Leticia_Furtado_2c.pdf
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Criminalistics

Share

Download

pdf (Português (Brasil))

Author(s)